Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Risk assessment bulletin scrapped

Two months ago, I posted about more Bush administration conflict with scientists, this time in the form of a bulletin on risk assessment that was being drafted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The National Academy of Sciences had taken a look at the bulletin and thought it should be scrapped. But, as the journal Nature reported in August, the OMB was still toying with the draft bulletin despite the bad review from NAS. Well, the OMB has gotten the message, finally, and scrapped the new bulletin, apparently deciding to update a 1995 document on risk assessment instead. (See the news story in this week's Nature - may be behind pay wall.)

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Politics and risk assessment

Political interference with science (or just ignoring scientific findings altogether) has gotten a lot of attention under the Bush administration. An editorial in this week’s issue of Nature brings up an example of science ignored.

Apparently, in 2006, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) drafted a new bulletin on risk assessment (including a new definition of risk assessment and new standards for its application). The National Academy of Sciences reviewed the draft at the request of the OMB and several other federal agencies. A two word excerpt from the NAS report sums it up: “fundamentally flawed.”

A press release issued in January of 2007 quotes the chair of the NAS committee that produced the review as saying:

“We began our review of the draft bulletin thinking we would only be recommending changes, but the more we dug into it, the more we realized that from a scientific and technical standpoint, it should be withdrawn altogether."

If this all happened months ago, then why is it the subject of an editorial in Nature? Because the draft bulletin is still alive and kicking. According to the editorial, the draft is under revision. I suppose that’s a good thing, but what kind of revision can fix something that’s fundamentally flawed?

Election Widget

Just added a widget from grist.org on the bottom of the right sidebar. I haven't written much about the environment (and even less about politics), but I thought I'd add it here so that it reminds me to check up on things as the election cycle progresses.

The widget is available here.